Ghost Recon AW multiplayer trailer

Ghost Recon AW multiplayer trailer

2006-02-22 16:30:10 by Manager

UBI released this trailer of Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter, presenting the co-op part in the multiplayer mode. Hopefully those framedrops only is a result of a bad capturing setup.
Update: 720p version added.

Video gallery

Multiplayer co-op trailer

Download
WMV
14.18 MB
640x352
 

Multiplayer co-op trailer 720p

Download
WMV
133.91 MB
1280x720
Page : 1 2 3 >>
Author Message
school

school
Since 1136 Days

2006-02-22 16:43:39 Ghost Recon AW multiplayer trailer

is this xbox 1 are xbox360 trailer. somethink don,t look right.

munkieNS

munkieNS
Since 1154 Days

2006-02-22 16:44:02

GOD this game looks amazing! Those jungles look great, and the desert environments really resemble the landscape in Mexico. This simply cannot come out soon enough.

autolycos

autolycos
Since 1099 Days

2006-02-22 17:08:41

Taken from ghostrecon.net forum (written by employee at RedStorm):
"..there seems to be some weird compression issues with that one [trailer] floating around (see the chugging in the video), and it is really low res."

Cece

Since 1100 Days

2006-02-22 17:25:00

The graphic continues not to impress me...
But it seems very fun.. can't wait...

Slabs

Slabs
Since 1209 Days

2006-02-22 17:34:53 In reply to Cece (2006-02-22 17:25:00)

Munkie: The Multiplayer is all set in Nicaragua though! :P

Posted by Cece
The graphic continues not to impress me...
But it seems very fun.. can't wait...
I hope you mean the multiplayer only!

FireWire

IEEE 1394 FireWire - IEEE 1394
Since 1179 Days

2006-02-22 17:38:54

Multiplayer seems just like ghost recon 2 and summit strike (DUH it uses an upgrade gr2:ss engine) wich is a really good thing IMO, i'm pretty excited about this game...

miketuck3r

miketuck3r
Since 1172 Days

2006-02-22 17:40:01

the multiplayer graphics are toned down from the single player but i dont play multiplayer to look at the lighting, looks great in the video preiews that i have seen

Cece

Since 1100 Days

2006-02-22 17:41:42 In reply to Slabs (2006-02-22 17:34:53)

Posted by Slabs
I hope you mean the multiplayer only!
Yep, single player looks really better

Slabs

Slabs
Since 1209 Days

2006-02-22 17:42:16 In reply to FireWire (2006-02-22 17:38:54)

Posted by FireWire
Multiplayer seems just like ghost recon 2 and summit strike (DUH it uses an upgrade gr2:ss engine) wich is a really good thing IMO, i'm pretty excited about this game...
The difference is still pretty huge though, the levels in GR2 and Summit Strike were comparitively sparse and suffered from awful draw distances.

Nossy

Since 1156 Days

2006-02-22 18:19:18

Will we be able to utilize Blackhawks and the minigun in co-op/deathmatch MP? Sucky thing is you won't be able to do some of the "acrobatic" moves and Wall covering in MP.

rekathon3

rekathon3
Since 1015 Days

2006-02-22 18:35:46

Can't wait

munkieNS

munkieNS
Since 1154 Days

2006-02-22 18:48:37 In reply to Slabs (2006-02-22 17:34:53)

Posted by Slabs
Munkie: The Multiplayer is all set in Nicaragua though! :P
Heh, woops!

LEBATO

IS WRONG LEBATO - IS WRONG
Since 1301 Days

2006-02-22 19:16:16

I just bought Fight Night, GRAW is next :D

---
Did you agree with me? Yes, No? Visit http://www.lebato.blogspot.com and see if we agree on something.

Inflatable

Inflatable
Since 1816 Days

2006-02-22 19:27:04

I can't believe they are still toning down graphics in MP on the Xbox 360.. The aliasing in this trailer is appalling..

Luckily I prefer my PC for games like this, no such issues there.. I'm sorry, but it's just a fact..

---
www.cyberwarriors.nl

most_hated

most_hated
Since 1179 Days

2006-02-22 19:41:27 In reply to Nossy (2006-02-22 18:19:18)

Posted by Nossy
Sucky thing is you won't be able to do some of the "acrobatic" moves and Wall covering in MP.
I'm pretty sure I saw the dive in a multiplayer video.

Acert93

Mr. Bad Cop Since 1149 Days

2006-02-22 19:42:20

This kind of shows how great the SP engine is. Besides the MP not having tiling (which affects anti-aliasing and a number of other effects), the lighting, grass, models, etc... are just a step down. In some ways it looks very similar to the SP footage they showed 6-8 months ago--UBI did a GREAT job of improving the SP in that time.

The MP gameplay looks hot. Co-op for the win! Looks like a great MP entry and should be a ton of fun.

Acert93

Mr. Bad Cop Since 1149 Days

2006-02-22 19:46:01 In reply to Inflatable (2006-02-22 19:27:04)

Posted by Inflatable
I can't believe they are still toning down graphics in MP on the Xbox 360.. The aliasing in this trailer is appalling..

Luckily I prefer my PC for games like this, no such issues there.. I'm sorry, but it's just a fact..
The MP was done by a different team who used an upgraded engine instead of a new one. Has nothing to do with "toning down" but with this fact: You are creating a game and the engine is not done. You can stick a ton of people on the SP part and push it out, but co-developing a MP version (which requires a lot of testing) is too much time so you take the route of letting the MP team start earlier on gameplay by using an upgraded engine.

And like has been said by Blim on this site: SP uses a new engine that tiles (meaning nice "free" AA) whereas the MP does not.

Watching the video I hope you noticed it said that some of the MP campaign is exclusive to the 360.

PlumbDrumb

Still drinking PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
Since 1172 Days

2006-02-22 19:49:10

That was a shit quality trailer anyway.

---
"That stuff is so strong, it's religious"

dec0y

dec0y
Since 1053 Days

2006-02-22 19:50:36 In reply to FireWire (2006-02-22 17:38:54)

Posted by FireWire
Multiplayer seems just like ghost recon 2 and summit strike (DUH it uses an upgrade gr2:ss engine) wich is a really good thing IMO, i'm pretty excited about this game...
people need to stop saying this, it's UNTRUE. FUCK.

PlumbDrumb

Still drinking PlumbDrumb - Still drinking
Since 1172 Days

2006-02-22 19:52:47 In reply to dec0y (2006-02-22 19:50:36)

Posted by dec0y
people need to stop saying this, it's UNTRUE. FUCK.
Well, with Blim as our source on that bit of info, I suggest you give us a link to a statement from a more credible source, before we "stop" saying that.

---
"That stuff is so strong, it's religious"

SimonM7

SimonM7
Since 1202 Days

2006-02-22 20:07:17

What about coop? I never really understood what version of the engine that uses and whether or not the single player missions will be playable at all in coop. The biggest graw - er, draw - for me is certainly the prospect of going through the single player campaign (with those yummy graphics) with a friend.

If it's reduced to the multiplayer engine with no wall hug/slides/dives in coop I'll be right miffed.

---
An Elegant Tapestry of Aphorisms - The musings of a brilliant self proclaimed gaming philosopher.
http://aetoa.blogspot.com

school

school
Since 1136 Days

2006-02-22 20:17:50

the game won,t look like those pictures - something wrong with the trailer as blim say. when the game is release it will look way better than the trailer and the images.

Cece

Since 1100 Days

2006-02-22 20:40:35 In reply to Acert93 (2006-02-22 19:46:01)

Posted by Acert93
The MP was done by a different team who used an upgraded engine instead of a new one. Has nothing to do with "toning down" but with this fact: You are creating a game and the engine is not done. You can stick a ton of people on the SP part and push it out, but co-developing a MP version (which requires a lot of testing) is too much time so you take the route of letting the MP team start earlier on gameplay by using an upgraded engine.
.
Can you tell me where did you read that?
tnks

Inflatable

Inflatable
Since 1816 Days

2006-02-22 20:44:21 In reply to Acert93 (2006-02-22 19:46:01)

Posted by Acert93
The MP was done by a different team who used an upgraded engine instead of a new one. Has nothing to do with "toning down" but with this fact: You are creating a game and the engine is not done. You can stick a ton of people on the SP part and push it out, but co-developing a MP version (which requires a lot of testing) is too much time so you take the route of letting the MP team start earlier on gameplay by using an upgraded engine.

And like has been said by Blim on this site: SP uses a new engine that tiles (meaning nice "free" AA) whereas the MP does not.

Watching the video I hope you noticed it said that some of the MP campaign is exclusive to the 360.
Tbh I don't give a **** what the reason is why the MP looks worse, point is it does and that just sucks.. End of story..

I've also not seen a lot of games (if any) that use different engines for SP and MP, and it's not like I started gaming on PC and gameconsoles and following the industry yesterday.. I find it a very strange descion (if true), especially when the MP looks much worse because of it..

Good if it's Xbox 360 exclusive, because if it's like this on the PC aswell I certainly won't buy this game ( I doubt I will anyway, more looking forward to UT2007 and ET:QW)..

Edit: I see there appears to be something wrong with the trailer, lets hope for the people wanting this game on the Xbox 360 that's the reason why the aliasing etc is so appaling in this trailer..

---
www.cyberwarriors.nl

OptimusRhyme

Since 1014 Days

2006-02-22 21:54:57

That honestly looks horrible. I'll make full judgement on the game once i've tried a demo of it, but that video, including those pictures make the game look like a regular Xbox game. It's still looked decent in other pictures, so it still warrants a play.

Page : 1 2 3 >>
You have to be logged in to post in this forum!