2006-04-11 12:03:28 Battlefield 2 MC trailer

this game is very addicting IMO i just spent whole night (went to sleep at 6 AM......started playing this game 10 pm) playing just the demo :o this was the first time i have played a game for so long and its just demo

---
XBOX RULEZ

2006-04-11 12:33:10

argg gamespot gave "just" 7.5...
Great trailer anyway tnx....

2006-04-11 13:30:16 In reply to Cece (2006-04-11 12:33:10)

2006-04-11 14:49:18

cant wait till tommarow! demo was awesome! maybe nothing like the PC version but it sure gives me that intense feeling when theres 24 people in a match!

---
HOOAH!!!!

2006-04-11 15:04:46

i played the demo and those shadow effects look pretty but sometimes they look horrible! like they glitch and flicker like crazy sometimes. I hope its not like that in the full version. Or maybe theres no helping it.....they keep using these low res soft shadow effects on 360 games that look really bad sometimes. (GRAW, PDZ, Tomb Raider) guess its better than no shadows tho?.

2006-04-11 15:44:36 In reply to CockKnocker (2006-04-11 15:04:46)

yeh i know wat you mean man. the shadows in GRAWF are horrible . just look around in the helicoptor and you see wat we mean lol

2006-04-11 17:50:57

All this FPSage on the 360 and me without one :'(

---
Masterfulness is earned though total pwnage. Not given.

2006-04-11 18:08:54 In reply to skinedd (2006-04-11 15:44:36)

---
Did you agree with me? Yes, No? Visit http://www.lebato.blogspot.com and see if we agree on something.

2006-04-11 18:58:23

So what's the fantastically magical codec required to view this "oh so special" trailer?

2006-04-11 20:57:49

The Demo is awesome!!! Graphic look pretty, but gameplay iz amazing! The situations are hapened sometimes looks like the action film!

2006-04-11 22:39:47

i hate the bf2 demo. its so boring. just lucky if you kill something, its nothing to kill.

2006-04-11 22:58:32

I didn't like the demo either. If you've played BF2 on PC than Modern Combat just seems like a dumbed down port. The graphics are a bit better on 360, but the gameplay feels clunky on the console.

2006-04-12 04:23:19 In reply to CockKnocker (2006-04-11 15:04:46)

2006-04-12 07:12:03

I have to agree though; much of the shadows in MC are bad enough to distract you from the game.

2006-04-13 18:39:53

Yeh the shadows are annoying but I think the developer has already anounced it will be releasing a patch to fix them some time after release.

I don't think it's a bad thing to critisize them - when you're playing MC it really distracts your eye when they flicker and generally they bring down the tone of the graphics - which are generally very good.

2006-04-13 22:36:54

If the game didn't have a current gen version it probably would've earned atleast an 8.8

---
[b] Never judge a game too harshly via screenshots or videos, because they are in no way capable of properly representing what the game truly looks like were you to see it running in front of you on a 360 [/b]

2006-04-14 18:13:47

I agree with Optimus. What's strange is that some games receive high praise despite being ports. Look at Burnout Revenge on the Xbox 360? Visually, it's not really a step up from the Xbox version. It had 10 new crash junctions and a new "Revenge Rival" feature for online play. But it's pretty much the same game. Does it suffer critically because of this? No, the critics still lavish it with massive scores. Battlefield MC comes along with greatly enhanced visuals, a few new maps and, most importantly, netcode that ACTUALLY WORKS and it's mauled for being a port.

Sad.

I've got the game. If you have Xbox Live and you're into FPS... you need this game. It's the best multiplayer shooter on the console.